Thank you for helping us if you like to send money order you can send it to our address at
Dear Christian Prince
I am really blessed to come across you video clips dealing with islam, are the need of the hour. I want to buy your book The deception of allah, but I am in the midlle east, (Qatar) so I cannot order it here as it will be confiscated. Pls let me know if it is available in a downloadable form so I can get it as fast as possible. For this tell me how I can pay you.
Keep up the great work.
Hi Azwin the only way to get the book is order it from Amazon or you can make a donation in the site of 34$ to cover the mail cost and I will send you the book to your address just be sure to make a note about the book and when you donate to know that its made for the book,and do not forget to give us your mailing address.
God bless you.
Hi there Christian Prince,
I like when you expose islam alot but I heard one of you’re recent views and i want to point out something…
…Once again you criticized harshly evolution and went so far as to say that Christians who accept evolution can’t be real Christians or rather no Christian can accept evolution. WHAT IF I SHOWED YOU THIS:
To show you it is compatible with the Bible check this:
To see that infact the MAJORITY of mainstream Christians BOTH Protestant and Catholics support evolution AND EVEN THE JEWISH see:
Is that enough evidence for you to reconsider your statement? Next i need to clarify some more of ur misconceptions…
…U claimed that if monkeys turned into humans why are there still monkeys. Im sorry to say this CP but here you were the one making a hasty statement of ignorance. The fact of the matter is firstly NO SCIENTIST claims that monkeys turned directly into humans. It is a POPUATION OF MONKEYS which gradually chnged and over time led to tailess “monkeys” known as apes. THEN AGAIN A POPULATION of those gradually over many years changed and we had e.g. australopithecus, homo erectus, homo egastor, homo sapien n finally homo sapien sapien. The other populations of former monkeys or rather monkey like creatures changed gradually into monkeys as we see today n also the apes we see today COZ OF THEIR RESPECTIVE ENVIRNOMENTAL PRESSURES. hen there are populations of apes which never changed any much at all COZ THEY REMAINED IN AN UNCHAGING ENVIRONEMTT N HENCE THERE WAS NO SELECTIVE PRESSURE ON THEM. In regards to sexual reproduction having evolved from asexual reproduction thats coz this introduces more variation, due to recombination when sperm n eggs cobine, making the organism more quickly adopt to its environment as if it were if the organism stayed asexual. All you need to do is google “evolution of sexual reproduction” or go seach for it at talkorigins.org. PLZ DONT REMAIN IGNORANT ON THIS SUBJECT WHILST BEING SO AWESOME AT EXPOSING ISLAM.
Hi again Christian Prince,
Just in case you do not wish to post these replies of mine publicly I’m most welcome to discuss with you in private under my email jonnykzjAThotmail.com. u can make an anonymous email accnt be4 mailing me there BUT PLZ take this into consideration. dont become wht muslims do i.e. being in denial, presenting others views inaccurately n being inconsistent.
Hi there CP,
I’m so glad you’ve let my comments come through. I hope to discuss these things with you in more detail someday. ALSO CP before i forget, you did blame science in the show as well saying something like you don’t care about it. First of all I’d like to point out that again the majority of Christians have found peace with science AND OTHERS even claim that Christianity gave rise to science as we know it today such that they go together hand in hand. 2ndly much of your work whether it be using the internet or your own pc relies on scientific endeavor. Also at times when you expose islam you did tell the muslims how scientifically absurd their claims actually are. might wanna rem the fly hadith where supposedly it contains disease in one wing and cure in another. AGAIN u did an awesome job there. I then remember you saying that “science one said the earth was flat” and i must admit to you i was upset with you for quite sometime. But then i thght to myself wait he has probably only misunderstood the issue. YOU SEE CP back in the times the majority of people, irrespective of their religion, thought that the earth was flat, N THE SCIENTISTS BACK THEN just didnt have anything to hsow otherwise. It wouldve been an extra ordinary claim back then. Scientists dont just make claims against everything in their respective societies without evidence at their disosal. tht wld be silly. also note tht back then there was no scientific community and peer review, a rigorous process employing anominity and rigid controls, ensuring that the conclusion arising from a set of data is as unbiased as humanly possible.
I also would like to point out something regarding, i think her name is “kristy”, on the show. She’s a very nice person and always polite so far as i’ve heard BUT in that same show she pointed out something about “margarine” and “butter”. She said once science claimed margarine is better then again now butter. I personally have never heard abt such IN PEER REVIEWED papers. From what ive heard the experts said that one ought to listen to ones body IN THIS CASE and eat some of everything(excluding poison ofcourse). NOW CP THIS IS IMPORTANT. Uc there is a huge difference btw magazines popularizing science such as national geographic for example and peer reviewed papers tht appear in “Nature(the journal)” or “science(another journal)”. These pop mags many a times hype a new discovery made by scietists without undertsnading all the details. A good example currently is the “neutrino” experiment which were shown by the experiment to have travelled “faster than light”. Next we saw the media all over the place claiming “EINSTEIN WAS WRONG, HA”. sure tht maybe the case BUT that’s not what the current scientific consensus is. It is still possible tht there was a systematic error in the experiment OR even if these particles were faster it cld be tht neutrinos are particles with -ve mass/energy and such particles according to relativity ALWAYS travel faster than light and other possibilities as well. LAST BUT NOT LEAST always remember that most scientists are humble and they admit that mistakes can be made and sometimes, yes, even something which originally seemed correct can turn out to be wrong. Nothing is ever claimed to absolute for scientists BUT IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE BEST POSSIBLE KNOWLEDGE WE CAN HAVE AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME. In other words one can say most of the times science gets it correct compared to any other methodology as far as the natural world is concerned.
HI CP,your book doesnt seem to be available in french, so if you ever need someone to translate it, feel free to ask me. As you maybe know, the muslim propaganda is huge in France, and many people are fed up with it, so your book could interess them.
My e mail : email@example.com
Lord bless you
hi colga do you have paltalk ?
Dear CP, i remember you once made a video showing that Muhammad’s original name was actually “Qatham”. Could you kindly provide me with the references from hadith or sira literature? Thanku very much.
Just noticed that there is actually a chapter in your book about Muhammad’s name originally being “qatham”. Are there references for that in there too? I’m considering to buy this book. I live in Germany. Have you considered getting it translated into German as well?
yes there is
Dear bro CP,
I really hope u as well as bro Usama Dakdok will read this msg. I heard ur show yesterday and i have to comment on something regarding what you said on 911 and burning the US flag. 1st i wanna address 911. you sounded like you criticized 911truth i.e. 911 according to you could not be an inside job. I’ve tried to reach you on your “allahleg” utube channel so that you may CONTACT BRO ALEX JONES, who’s one of our Christian brothers N VERY DEDICATED to fight the evil in this world. I’ve seen alot of his videos and he seems like a very honest and believing person. He’s got alot of evidence which even i believe shows AT THE VERY LEAST that muslims cld not have done 911 WITHOUT THEM BEING AIDED BY THE US GOV e.g. air defense stand down tht day, possible controlling of plain via remote to help fly it in accurately as planned and planting nano thermite in the buildings beforehand so as to acheive 1) the dramatic effect it did n 2) eliminate the evidence in the buildings carrying many evil gov secrets n 3) buildings were infested with asbestos n so they possibly wanted to rid them anyways n they knew the insurance wld pay them back all so no worries abt the money. ALSO note tht the Alex makes it clear the US gov is being controlled by the US FED which u shld know is a PRIVATE, NOT FEDERAL, organization. ADDITIONALLY i myself have come to the conclusion that this powerful elite has another sinister plan few, if any, have though off. i doubt whether even Alex has but I’ll explain it here. I coin it “OPERATION GRAND SCHEME”. What i mean by this is that the Elite i.e. Trilateral, CFR and Bilderberg want on one hand as many ppl as possible to belive muslims did 911 by themselves n blame them from it. On the other hand, AS YOU RIGTHTLY NOTED, they’re defending them and giving them power. Ofcourse they are the oes who’re actually controlling them and want to use them for their evil purposes. NOW wht i think will happen is tht once enough people beleive muslims did 911 on their own THEYLL MAKE SURE A GOV DOC IS RELEASED SAYING 20 yrs ago the US GOV just had to carry out 911, just as was planned in Guf of tonkin, so we cld get ppl to support the attack of a POTNETIAL danger in afghanistan etc. BY THEN ppl, INC U IF URE NOT CAREFUL, will be filled with so much guilt tht they originally blamed the muslims, tht they will spend the rest of their lives apologizing to them. THEN THE ELITE can have them get to power and install shariah with ease N GUESS WHO THE KHALIFA is gonna be or his boss. The same evil Elite i talked abt earlier of which Mrs. Hilaary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Larry Silverstein,etc r probably part of and both obama and Bush r their lackeys in this game. infact both parties dems and repubs are.
SO CP MY ADVISE TO YOU IS THIS: NEVER make 911 the main reason to attack islam AND ALWAYS supplement this by saying something like “EVEN IF islam had absolutely nothing to do with 911, it is still as evil as it can be and i dont believe for a sec tht if muslims CLD do such a thing on their own they wld hessitate to do so” to safeguard urself just in case. Also warn as many Christians as possible.
NOW on to the flag burning issue. You said it is hypocritical that flag burning is allowed whilst mentioning the name of Jesus in public schools is not. Well in the latter it could be said that in public schools we’re talking about dealing with children under 18 and those are not to be indoctrinated with ANY religion WHILST children over 18 cld do argue as they plz amongst themselves. Same wld go for flag burning. If anyone asks his/her child under 18 to burn the flag that could be considered indoctrination and legal action be taken against but if over 18 yrs old ppl wanna do it i say we cant have laws against that for then we’d be opening a pendora’s box that would have terribe consequences like here in Germany where they have laws against insults and even prohibit ppl questioning the holocaust, all in the name of not honoring ppl or the country. That’d be my take on it. AND ASALWAYS if you wanna contact me I’ve already postsed my email address.
Dear bro Usama Dakdok,
I have to point out another point you made in the recent debatetv show. You said that under US law there is one man and one woman for marriage. Here I see a problem because this means Christianity is making itself part of the government which is against the idea of SEPARATION OF CHURCH N STATE. Gov shld stay out of marriage altogether. People should not get any special legal privileges from the government just because they are married the Christian way. This is unfair AND EVEN BAPTIST CHRISTIAN, KENT HOVIND, whom i have many disagreements with, SUPPORTS THAT GOV SHLD STAY OUT OF MARRIAGE ALTOGETHER. Children of poor parents on the other should get gov support IRRESPECTIVE of whether they were born within or outside a marriage. I myself, when i decide to get married, wont bother to sign a legal gov document but I’ll be going to a Church and get married there privately. That’s it.
NOW to address the other part where you said the 1st amendment when it talks about gov not hindering the practices of religion, the founding fathers had only Christianity in mind. I’d have to humbly disagree AND add what they had in mind most probably WERE THE WORSHIP RITUALS of different religions provided these don’t infringe on the rights of other ppl.
You must be logged in to post a comment.